根据现有的氧化所有证据
2021年5月6日,欧盟据欧盟食品安全局(EFSA)消息,重新欧盟食品添加剂和调味剂小组( FAF )重新评估了二氧化钛(titanium dioxide )(E171)作为食品添加剂的评估品添安全性。
根据现有的氧化所有证据,不能排除该添加剂对遗传毒性的钛作担忧,鉴于存在许多不确定性,为食评估小组得出结论,加剂当E171用作食品添加剂时,全性不再被认为是欧盟安全的。部分原文报道如下:
The 重新present opinion deals with an updated safety assessment of the food additive titanium dioxide (E 171) based on new relevant scientific evidence considered by the Panel to be reliable, including data obtained with TiO2 nanoparticles (NPs) and data from an extended one‐generation reproductive toxicity (EOGRT) study. Less than 50% of constituent particles by number in E 171 have a minimum external dimension < 100 nm. In addition, the Panel noted that constituent particles < 30 nm amounted to less than 1% of particles by number. The Panel therefore considered that studies with TiO2 NPs < 30 nm were of limited relevance to the safety assessment of E 171. The Panel concluded that although gastrointestinal absorption of TiO2 particles is low, they may accumulate in the body. Studies on general and organ toxicity did not indicate adverse effects with either E 171 up to a dose of 1,000 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day or with TiO2 NPs (> 30 nm) up to the highest dose tested of 100 mg/kg bw per day. No effects on reproductive and developmental toxicity were observed up to a dose of 1,000 mg E 171/kg bw per day, the highest dose tested in the EOGRT study. However, observations of potential immunotoxicity and inflammation with E 171 and potential neurotoxicity with TiO2 NPs, together with the potential induction of aberrant crypt foci with E 171, may indicate adverse effects. With respect to genotoxicity, the Panel concluded that TiO2 particles have the potential to induce DNA strand breaks and chromosomal damage, but not gene mutations. No clear correlation was observed between the physico‐chemical properties of TiO2 particles and the outcome of either in vitro or in vivo genotoxicity assays. A concern for genotoxicity of TiO2 particles that may be present in E 171 could therefore not be ruled out. Several modes of action for the genotoxicity may operate in parallel and the relative contributions of different molecular mechanisms elicited by TiO2 particles are not known. There was uncertainty as to whether a threshold mode of action could be assumed. In addition, a cut‐off value for TiO2 particle size with respect to genotoxicity could not be identified. No appropriately designed study was available to investigate the potential carcinogenic effects of TiO2 NPs. based on all the evidence available, a concern for genotoxicity could not be ruled out, and given the many uncertainties, the Panel concluded that E 171 can no longer be considered as safe when used as a food additive.
资料来源:食品伙伴网。如涉及作品内容、评估品添版权等问题,氧化请与本网联系删除。钛作
相关链接:食品,为食添加剂,加剂二氧化钛
相关阅读
- 感情鸡汤文章深夜感情电台fm
- 五个月孕肚照片分享,看看宝宝的成长状态
- 哈尔滨:强化虚假违法农资广告监管
- 旭虹光电盖板玻璃生产线综合良率居行业前列,企业新闻
- vivo Y33s正式上市!1299元起,支撑18W快充战单模5G
- 使用玻璃胶做粘接的流程 家装材料要怎么挑玻璃胶,行业资讯
- 石英玻璃管拥有哪些特性 为什么石英可做光学玻璃,行业资讯
- 玻璃幕墙该如何隔热保温 什么方法能制造镀膜玻璃,行业资讯
- “指定管辖格式条款”系列报道|“指定仲裁”“指定管辖”成消费者维权障碍,专家教你破解技巧!
- Mini LED在高等显示器市场渗透率持续提升,市场研究
- 乃孜来颗粒中化学成分的UHPLC
- 玻璃杯的优点与注意事项 玻璃茶具有哪些优势之处,行业资讯
- 水中甲醛溶液标准物质:确保室内空气质量检测准确性
- 玻璃把手有哪些常见尺寸 玻璃门通常使用什么玻璃,行业资讯
- 浅析AR coating光伏玻璃镀膜工艺,经验交流
- 等你来!福建省消委会公开征集消费维权志愿者
- 中通助力苦橙出山 奉节中通1月4日运出2万票脐橙
- 生意社:延续上周走势 玻璃市场稳中小涨(9.9
- 玻璃窗膜为什么能够隔热 玻璃窗膜通常分成多少层,行业资讯
- 玻璃把手有哪些常见尺寸 玻璃门通常使用什么玻璃,行业资讯